Mother Goddess Mary
Jesus’ birth mother, Mary, plays a prominent role in Christianity. As the story goes, she was a virgin who birthed Jesus. She is the central figure in Roman Catholicism and Eastern Orthodox Christianity. She is the Mother of God, Church tradition holds, thereby implying Jesus was God and that God has a mother, which is indeed highly peculiar. Many Catholics pray to Mary rather than to Jesus or God. In this way, Mary is a proxy for God. The Quran consistently names Jesus the son of Mary rather than the Son of God. The images of Mary with the child resemble those of the Mother Goddess. They picture Jesus as the Son of God, the Mother. That is most noteworthy because Jesus believed he was Adam, the Son of Eve, the Son of God. How could this happen? Inquiring minds want to know. Now, there is the historical explanation, and there is the script that God wrote.

In the early years of Christianity, there was probably no cult of the Virgin Mary. The earliest Christian paintings, made around 235 AD, depict Christ, Peter, and martyrs, but not Mary. The first solid evidence of devotion to the Virgin Mary dates back to the third century, but its origin remains unclear. Perhaps, early Christians prayed to Mary as they did to other saints. Possibly, Mary granted the most requests, which made her increasingly popular. In this sneaky manner, the Mother Goddess sneaked into the Church through a back door, via the cult of the Virgin Mary. The ability to give birth without the need of a man is the miracle of the Mother Goddess. Christians later created statues and icons of the Virgin with the child Jesus, looking like the Egyptian mother goddess Isis with her child Horus.

So, what brought Mary to this elevated status? Mary is not only the mother of Jesus, but Christians and Muslims believe she was a virgin. Jesus’ birth from a virgin didn’t happen. That we can be sure of. Matthew and Luke mention Jesus’ virgin birth, but Mark and John don’t. Had it been common knowledge, all the Gospels would have mentioned it. And if it had happened, it would have been common knowledge. So, was it a myth that sprouted up in the Christian community? Or did the Church Fathers have a pressing cause to invent the story of Jesus’ virgin birth? There is reason to believe the latter.
And Jesus became a carpenter
The virgin birth of Jesus never happened. In Galatians, Paul writes that God sent His Son, who was born of a woman (Galatians 4:4). That was around 55 AD. Had he known about the virgin birth, that would have been an excellent opportunity to mention it, but somehow he forgot. Or the virgin birth hadn’t happened, which is more likely. A motive for inventing the virgin birth that immediately presents itself is that if God were Jesus’ Father, he couldn’t have a human father. It is not entirely satisfactory. If Jesus saw God as his Father, there is no pressing need for that. In that case, Jesus said ‘Father’ to God. That would be all there is to it, and there would be no reason to make this up.
And so, you might believe that the myth emerged within the Christian community to fill in the gap, as there was no narrative of Jesus’ birth. You wouldn’t think the Church’s leaders orchestrated it. There is reason to think otherwise, as we will see. Paul’s phrase ‘born of a woman’ also suggests so. And so, there must be more to it. That the virgin birth is an intentional falsification, you can infer by comparing Mark to Matthew. Mark dates from around 70 AD. Matthew came a few years later. Both are truthful to some extent. You can use one to detect the lie in the other. Mark tells that people in Jesus’ hometown called him ‘the carpenter’ and ‘Mary’s son’ (Mark 6:3),
Isn’t this the carpenter? Isn’t this Mary’s son and the brother of James, Joseph, Judas, and Simon? Aren’t his sisters here with us?’
The Gospel of Mark doesn’t mention Joseph, who was Jesus’ human father. It does note that Jesus had brothers and sisters, of whom we learn only the names of the brothers. You would expect the townspeople to call him Joseph’s son. But they didn’t, and called him Mary’s son, as if the virgin birth had occurred, while Mark doesn’t mention that noteworthy incident that you would definitely report on if you knew it had happened. It could be an error, but the mistake is so specific that it seems intentional. That it could be an edit, you can find in Matthew (Matthew 13:55),
Isn’t this the carpenter’s son? Isn’t his mother’s name Mary, and aren’t his brothers James, Joseph, Simon and Judas? Aren’t all his sisters with us?
The Gospel of Matthew mentions both the virgin birth and that Jesus has a human father and explains them in the virgin birth story, where Joseph accepts Jesus as his son, rendering such an edit redundant. Mark came before Matthew, scholars agree, and it contains fewer fancies. Mark and Matthew both drew on the same source, which referred to Jesus as the carpenter’s son. Likely, Mark dates from shortly after the Church Fathers had decided to introduce the virgin birth. The clumsy editing makes it seem as if Jesus were a carpenter.
By the time Matthew wielded his pen, the Church Fathers had contrived a proper cover story so that they didn’t have to remain secretive about his human father anymore. Such an explanation presumes that the authors of Mark and Matthew were prominent people within the Church who had contact with its leadership. They wouldn’t have done so if it had not been a solution to a theological problem.
The author of Matthew also sought a prophecy in the scriptures that predicted Jesus’ virgin birth. Isaiah wrote that a young woman would give birth to a son as a sign that God would destroy Judah’s enemies (Isaiah 7:14). Isaiah addressed King Ahaz in the eighth century BC and didn’t foresee the coming of Jesus, who would arrive seven centuries later. The Greek translation of the Jewish Bible, available in the first century AD, translated a young woman as a virgin. The author of Matthew saw it as a prophecy of Jesus’ virgin birth. There was no prophecy of this event that never happened, and that is no coincidence.
The author was particularly preoccupied with proving that Jesus was the long-awaited Jewish Messiah. To that aim, he fabricated a genealogy to demonstrate that Jesus descended from the House of David. And behold, he uncovered fourteen generations in all from Abraham to David, fourteen from David to the exile to Babylon, and fourteen from the exile to the Messiah, Jesus, which is so neat that it only happens in fairy tales. The prophet Micah prophesied that a ruler would come from Bethlehem (Micah 5:2). And somehow Matthew ‘discovered’ that it was the birthplace of Jesus. Mark and John don’t mention the virgin birth or Bethlehem. Jesus was probably born in Nazareth, had an ordinary childhood and joined the movement of John the Baptist.
Mary as the New Eve
If Jesus called God his Father, there is no reason to invent the virgin birth. You don’t need to prove that God is Jesus’ Father. If Jesus said so, that would be good enough. His having a human father wouldn’t change that. The answer to the mystery is that Jesus never called God ‘Father,’ but rather ‘Mother.’ Jesus was the Son of God because God, in the person of Mary Magdalene, convinced Jesus that he was Adam reincarnate, and that She was Eve reincarnate. And Eve didn’t come from Adam’s rib, but Adam was Eve’s son. The virgin birth of Jesus from Mary replaced the ‘virgin birth’ of Adam from Eve.
You can infer that from Christian theology. God announced there would be enmity between the offspring of the serpent and that of the woman (Genesis 3:15). Christians see it as a prophecy predicting the coming of Jesus. They believe the seed of the woman refers to the virgin birth of Jesus, while it was Adam’s. That made Mary the New Eve. In this manner, Mary became the replacement for Eve. It is, however, doubtful that those who invented the virgin birth also came up with this.
Eve being Adam’s mother and Jesus calling God his Mother contradicts the Jewish scriptures. You can’t have that, so you have to work on that fact to make it fit. So, why not say Jesus was born of a virgin instead? After all, Jesus was Adam, and Eve was a ‘virgin’ when she gave birth to Adam. And God’s name was Mary, just like Jesus’ mother, while God was Jesus’ Mother. That was very convenient indeed, a convenience provided by providence, no doubt. Mark and Matthew both name Jesus Mary’s son, perhaps because she played a prominent role during Jesus’ ministry and was present at the cross.
Cloak and dagger
The Virgin Mary appeared more frequently to people than Jesus and performed more miracles than any other saint. There is little or no evidence of many of these supposed miracles, but the Fatima Miracle had 40,000 witnesses, so there should be no doubt that something spectacular had happened there. God the Father doesn’t appear in this way. And there are no 40,000 witnesses who saw a miracle that the Father announced. That is because there never was a Father. Virgin Mary became such a potent figure because she is the cloak behind which God the Mother has hidden Herself so far. Now, we are at the cloak-and-dagger part: the Quran boasts a hidden secret.
In the Quran, Mary is the most prominent woman and the only woman mentioned by name. The Quran dedicates an entire chapter, chapter 19, to the Virgin Mary. The number 19 has great significance in Islam. Some Muslims indulge in arcane numerological explanations as to why that is so. The Quran refers to this number in the chapter named ‘The Hidden Secret.’ And so, the Quran may hold a hidden secret related to this number. The Quran also claims Mary was a virgin, thus confirming the miracle of the Mother Goddess. The Virgin Mary became the cloak behind which God hid Her identity.
The star and crescent became Islam’s symbol. It has a long history predating Islam, as it was associated with a Moon goddess. In the Bible, the moon refers to the woman and the star to the child (Genesis 37:9). Hence, the Islamic symbol represents the Madonna with the child Jesus or the relationship between Khadijah bint Khuwaylid and Muhammad. She was fifteen years older. A woman of Her age could have been his mother.

The St. Mary of Zion Church in Ethiopia is said to contain the Ark of the Covenant. Legend has it that the Ark came to Ethiopia with King Menelik after he visited his father, King Solomon. The Ark symbolises Mary of Zion. The Ark is supposed to be the residence of Yahweh, the God of Israel.2 That is remarkable, as God’s name was also Mary.
Statue storm
The Protestant Reformation was an attempt to return to Christianity’s roots by viewing Scripture as the sole source of Christian truth. The Protestants ended church traditions that lacked biblical grounds, including the veneration of the Virgin Mary. Nothing in the Bible justifies the cult of Mary. Protestants removed icons and statues from their Churches because one of the Ten Commandments prohibits making images for worship (Exodus 20:4-5). In the Netherlands, the Protestant Reformation caused a ‘statue storm’ where Protestant religious vigilantes ravaged Catholic Church interiors.
Protestantism developed in an era of emerging rationalism and naturalism. And so, Protestants also object to magic and superstition, deeming it Satan’s work, while Catholics love miracles like healings at Lourdes and weeping Mary statues. Miracles have always been part of the Catholic tradition.
The Protestants erased an essential part of Christianity’s original message of the Mother Goddess giving birth to Her son. Instead of getting closer to the truth, the Protestants wandered further from it. And it didn’t solve anything, but only generated more confusion. The Protestants soon began fighting among themselves over the interpretation of the scriptures. You can’t be wrong, because if you are, you end up frying eternally in Satan’s ovens. That was the reason Protestantism started in the first place. So, after the Protestant storm is over, we have over 45,000 branches of Christianity.
Latest revision: 9 December 2025
Featured image: Madonna and Child, Kunsthistorisches Museum Wien. Public Domain.
Other images: Isis with Horus. Metropolitan Museum of Art. Wikimedia Commons. Public Domain; Saint Mary Bolnichka Icon. Wikimedia Commons. Public Domain.
1. Church of Our Lady Mary of Zion. Wikipedia.

