Now what?

So why did I write The Plan For The Future? And why is there reason to believe that it may be used? I am not more gifted than other people. There is some other reason. Chief Inspector Jacques Clouseau could solve every mystery, not because of his superior investigative methods or any other personal quality, but because he was a fictional character in a story. This universe might exist for entertainment and we may be fictional characters in a story too. And the story may be that this particular plan is going to be used. Why might that be so? That is a peculiar story.

In 2008 the end of civilisation seemed close. The financial system was about to break down. The financial crisis could trigger a new Great Depression or even worse as the previous Great Depression led to World War II. For decades I had an interest in interest-free money as I believed that interest would be the cause of the coming collapse and the end of human civilisation as we know it. The crisis made me think of that again. Then I made a remarkable discovery, which is that interest-free money with a holding tax and negative interest rates can prevent that from happening and bring peace and prosperity. You can read more about it in Natural Money And The Economy.

That was a peculiar find already as it could mark the beginning of a new era. It soon turned out that there was more to it. Things were getting weirder by the day. Then it appeared that Natural Money could be part of a greater plan and that God is a lady I once met. Over the years there had been a few peculiar coincidences referring to her. And so I came to investigate whether or not this could be true. This universe could be a virtual reality created for entertainment by an advanced civilisation. It could have an owner we may refer to as God. And God might be a woman who could have avatars and appear as ordinary human to us. You can read more about these findings in The Universe As A Virtual Reality and God Is A Woman And Jesus Was Her Husband.

There have been plenty of nutcases who believed themselves to be on a mission of God and perhaps I am one too. But there is a lot at stake. The financial crisis of 2008 was halted by central banks. Only the underlying cause of the crisis has not been taken away, which is interest on debts. The next crisis may only be solved with negative interest rates. And that is where Natural Money comes in. Hence, there indeed may be a plan behind Natural Money. Time will tell.

And so the script may be that humanity is on a suicidal path but that doom can be prevented in the nick of time by some unexpected turn of events. Natural Money may help to prevent a collapse of the global financial system and be the basis of a better future. That’s my guess for what it’s worth. For now I can only prepare for what might happen and try to think ahead. So here is the plan in a nutshell:

  • preventing the collapse of the financial system by implementing Natural Money and bringing financial sanity by ending usury;
  • putting human civilisation on a sustainable path (which may require negative interest rates, hence Natural Money);
  • making the world fairer by trying give everyone a reasonable treatment (human civilisation must be on a sustainable path first).

As a teenager I was interested in learning the lessons from history. Perhaps I was even a bit obsessed with that. Most notably, the Byzantine Empire caught my attention. It survived several setbacks and existed for 1,000 years. With the benefit of hindsight, this preoccupation with an empire that lasted 1,000 years is a bit peculiar considering later developments and a prophecy in the Bible. At some point I came to believe that there is no point in knowing so much about the past and learning the lessons of history. For my job in information technology it wasn’t much of an advantage.

I’m not aware of too many things
I know what I know, if you know what I mean
Philosophy is a walk on the slippery rocks
Religion is a light in the fog
I’m not aware of too many things
I know what I know, if you know what I mean, d-doo yeah

Choke me in the shallow water
Before I get too deep

What I am is what I am
Are you what you are or what?
What I am is what I am
Are you what you are or what?

– Edie Brickell, What I Am

Writing The Plan For The Future suddenly seemed to make learning the lessons from history important again. History is an unwieldy pile of people, ideas, conflicts and dates, and it is hard to see the bigger picture. More data only blur your view and prevent you from seeing what really matters. But there is help. The historian Yuval Noah Harari wrote a book, Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind. It is a good read and it is brief like the title suggests. It was of great use to me. It can help you to get a proper perspective. This plan leans heavily this book and most notably the idea of collective imaginations.

Human civilisations are based on collective imaginations. Collective imaginations don’t exist in objective reality but only in the minds of groups of people. For instance money, ideologies, nationalities, corporations and laws are collective imaginations.1 People imagine that euros and dollars have value but they are just pieces of paper or digits in a computer. Euros and dollars only exist in the imagination of humans. They believe that euros and dollars have value. Humans also imagine they live in nation states and that they have rights and obligations. Gods and religions are collective imaginations too.

Collective imaginations aren’t mere delusions. If you are the only one imagining something like human rights, others may think that you are delusional. But if you can convince others to share your belief, it becomes a collective imagination. Collective imaginations can be useful as they facilitate cooperation.1 For instance, to produce a mobile phone, you need the assistance of strangers working for several corporations, and money to make them work together. Humans imagine corporations and money to make a mobile phone. That’s what makes humans so successful as a specie.

That’s also what this plan is about. It aims at making you work together on changes to the social, political and economic order by proposing a collective imagination about the nature of reality and the identity of God. Success may depend on you believing the imagination or at least considering it to be useful. In other words, you may need faith. Your survival may depend on it. I can only do my best to make the imagination appear plausible and useful, but the argument has become quite extensive while the evidence is circumstantial and depends for a significant part on believing in my interpretation of the evidence. The proof may be that it is going to work, and it is not going to work if you think it is my personal delusion. It is up to you to believe in it, spread the news, and make others believe in it too.

1. Sapiens: A Brief History Of Humankind. Yuval Noah Harari (2014). Harvil Secker.

The flag of the Iroquois Confederacy

The Great Law Of Peace

What society could look like

Is it possible to have a free and equal society? The road to tyranny is often paved with good intentions. So can this question be asked? Or do we lack a proper vision? Perhaps there is a society that can show us the way. And even if the ideal isn’t attainable, it might still be something we could strive for. In the year 1142 five North American tribes, Mohawk, Onondaga, Oneida, Cayuga, and Seneca, formed a league that came to known as the Haudenosaunee, Iroquois or Five Nations. In 1722 a sixth tribe, Tuscarora, joined. The constitution of the league is known as The Great Law Of Peace.

The impact of the league on world history is considerable. The Haudenosaunee came up with the idea of equality and liberty for all. They may not have been the first but they influenced the European colonists settling in the United States as well as important 18th century European thinkers. As a consequence freedom, equality and brotherhood became the motto of the French Revolution. Freedom and equality are still amongst the most important values people believe that societies should be based.1

The formation of the league

According to legend three people made this happen. They were Dekanawida, known as the Great Peacemaker, Ayenwatha also known as Hiawatha, and Jigonhsasee, known as the Mother of Nations, whose home was open to everyone. The league was proposed to make an end to the constant warfare between the neighbouring tribes. The warrior leader Tododaho of the Onondaga kept on opposing the idea.

Deganawidah then took a single arrow and asked Tododaho to break it, which he did easily. Then he bundled together five arrows and asked Tododaho to break them too. He couldn’t. In the same way, Deganawidah prophesied, the Five Nations, each weak on its own, would fall unless they joined forces. Soon after Deganawidah’s warning, a solar eclipse occurred. The shaken Tododaho then agreed to the alliance.

The Haudenosaunee absorbed other peoples into their cultures as a result of warfare, adoption of captives and offering shelter to displaced peoples. During the American Revolution two tribes sided with the revolutionaries while the others remained loyal to Great Britain. The tribes were forced to take sides. They needed the favours of the winning party for disease had reduced their populations. After the war, the league was re-established.

The principles of the league

The Great Law Of Peace consists of 117 codicils that deal with the affairs between the Six Nations. The league is based on the consent of the peoples that are part of the league. When issues come up that need to be decided upon, the male chiefs or sachems of the clans are summoned to gather at the council fire in the territory of Onondaga.

The league aims for consensus. Decisions require large majorities of both the clan mothers and the sachems. This puts pressure on individual members of both groups not to impede decision making with insignificant objections or frivolous considerations. Referendums are held on matters of great importance.

Women have considerable influence. They are entitled to the land and its produce. The clan mothers deal with the internal affairs of their tribe. The clan mothers elect the sachems of their tribe and can remove them from office. Hence, the sachems heed the advice of their female relatives.

Influence

Compared to the despotic European societies of the 17th and 18th centuries, the Haudenosaunee was a liberal form of government. In the first two centuries of European colonisation there was no clear border between natives and newcomers. The two societies mingled and Europeans could see from close by how the natives lived. The North American natives had a level of personal freedom unknown in Europe.1

As for the Haudenosaunee, the colonial administrator Cadwallader Colden declared in 1749 that they had such absolute notions of liberty that they allow no kind of superiority of one over another and banish all servitude from their territories. Colden had been an adoptee of the Mohawks. Other Europeans complained that the natives do not know what it is to obey and think that everyone has the right to his own opinion.

Social equality was as important as personal liberty to the North American natives. They were appalled by the European division into social classes. The French adventurer Louis Armand de Lom d’Arce, Baron of Lahontan, lived in French Canada between 1683 and 1694, noted that the natives he visited could not understand why one man should have more than another and why the rich should have more respect than the poor.

Some early colonists preferred to live with the natives. The leaders of Jamestown tried to persuade natives to become like Europeans. That didn’t happen. Many English joined the locals despite threats of dire punishment. The same thing happened in New England. Puritan leaders were horrified when some members of a rival English settlement began living with the local tribes. As Franklin lamented in 1753:

When an Indian child has been brought up among us, taught our language and habituated to our customs, yet if he goes to see his relations and makes one Indian ramble with them, there is no persuading him ever to return. [But] when white persons of either sex have been taken prisoners young by the Indians, and lived a while among them, though ransomed by their friends, and treated with all imaginable tenderness to prevail with them to stay among the English, yet in a short time they become disgusted with our manner of life … and take the first good opportunity of escaping again into the woods, when there is no reclaiming them.

usseal
United States Seal

The European colonists had to adapt or they stood to lose their people to the native tribes. And so American society became more free and equal than societies in Europe. The European philosophers of the 18th century took their ideas of freedom from the native Americans and this eventually led to the French Revolution. Freedom and equality have now become the basic principles of democratic nations.

The ideals of liberty and limited government influenced the United States Constitution. The ideals of equality and consensus however did not. The US Seal features a bald eagle holding thirteen arrows bound together representing the thirteen founding states reminiscent of the bald eagle and the five arrows from the legend of the Five Nations.

Featured image: The flag of the Iroquois Confederacy. Mont Clair State University website (Montclair.edu).

1. New Revelations of the Americas Before Columbus (2005). Charles C. Mann. Knopf. [link]